print

Correlational findings

Study Gökdemir (2015): study TR 2010

Public
18+ aged, general public, Turkey, 2010
Survey name
INT-LiTS 2010
Sample
Respondents
N = 955
Non Response
4.79%
Assessment
Interview: face-to-face

Correlate

Authors's Label
Health
Our Classification
Distribution
Very bad = 1.8%; Bad = 9.31%; Medium = 27.72%; Good = 42.65%; Very good = 18.52%
Operationalization
Selpreport on single question:
How would you assess your health?
1. very bad
2
3
4
5. very good

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-SLW-c-sq-n-11-bb DM = + Very bad:  M = 3.50
Bad:       M = 4.50
Medium:    M = 5.01
Good :     M = 5.57
Very good: M = 6.15
O-SLW-c-sq-n-11-bb BMCT = p < .05 (Very bad, Bad, Medium) < Good < Very good