print

Correlational findings

Study Mollenkopf et al. (2004): study FI 2000

Public
55+ aged, Finland, 2000
Survey name
INT-MOBILATE
Sample
Respondents
N = 610
Non Response
45%
Assessment
Interview: face-to-face

Correlate

Authors's Label
Satisfaction with services
Our Classification
Distribution
Urban: M=7,4; SD=2,2; Rural: M= 7,1; SD=2,7; ns
Related specification variables
Operationalization
Selfreport on single question: All in all, how satisfied are you with your actual local facilities?
Rated on 11-point numerical scale
Question not found!
AUTHOR, please give question.

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-SLW-c-sq-n-11-d Beta = ns Urban areas O-SLW-c-sq-n-11-d Beta = ns Rural areas

Beta's controlled for:
- Age
- Gender
- Environment:Housing:
  - housing amenities
  - homeownership
  - satisfaction with housing
  - satisfaction with living area
- Mobility:
  - car in household
  - satisfaction with public transportation
  - satisfaction with mobility
- Services:
  - medical services
  - services and shops
- Culture:
  - Cultural amenities
  - natural environment
  - satisfaction with leisure
- Security:
  - security
- Social Environment:
  - living together
  - division social network
  - friends/kin nearby
- Economic situation:
  - Income per person
  - satisfaction with finances
- Health:
  - ADL
  - satisfaction with health

Only standardized regression coefficient significant at a maximum error rate of alpha=.05 are shown.