AVERAGE HAPPINESS IN 145 NATIONS 2000-2008
How much people enjoy their life-as-a-whole on scale 0 to 10

Top/bottom

Full list

Technical details

Cite as

Top/bottom

Top

>7,9

Middle range

± 6,0

Bottom

<4,2
 

Iceland
8,5

Phillipines

6,3

Belarus

4,2
Denmark
8,4

China

6,3

Chad

4,2
Colombia
8,1

Iran

6,0

Togo

4,1
Switzerland
8,1

India

5,9

Zimbabwe

3,3
Mexico
8,0

South Korea

5,9

Tanzania

3,2

Full list, alphabetic

nation1

Satisfaction with life 2, 3
(scale 0 - 10)

Number of surveys

Rank

Afghanistan4
4,7
1
126-127
Albania
4,6
1
128-131
Algeria
5,2
1
102-109
Angola4
4,9
2
118-125

Argentina

7,5
1
13-15

Armenia4

4,9
1
118-125

Australia

7,7
21
8-11

Austria

7,9
5
6

Azerbaijan4

5,4
1
93-97

Bangladesh

5,3
1
98-101

Belgium

7,3
2
17-20
Belize4
6,9
1
32-33
Benin4
4,3
1
138-141

Bolivia4

5,9
1
67-73
Bosnia
5,3
98-101
Botswana4
5,3
1
98-101

Brazil

7,4
1
16

Bulgaria

4,4
3
134-137
Burkina Faso
5,1
1
110-114
Burundi4
5,0
1
115-117
Cambodia4
4,4
1
134-137
Cameroon4
4,6
1
128-131

Canada 

7,6
1
12
Central African Republic4
5,1
1
110-114
Chad4
4,2
1
142

Chile

6,8
2
34-37

China

6,3
2
54-55

Colombia

8,1
1
3-4
Congo (Kinshasa)4
4,9
1
118-125
Costa Rica4
7,3
1
17-20
Croatia
6,1
1
56-59
Cuba4
6,0
1
60-66
Cyprus
7,3
2
17-20

Czechia

6,4
3
48-53

Denmark

8,4
4
2
Djibouti4
5,6
1
81-85

Dominican Republic4

5,7
1
74-80
Ecuador4
5,7
1
74-80
Egypt
5,1
2
110-114
El Salvador
7,2
1
21-24
Estonia
5,9
3
67-73
Ethiopia
4,3
1
138-141

Finland

7,8
6
7

France

6,5
5
43-47

Georgia4

4,4
1
134-137

Germany

7,2
8
21-24
Ghana
5,7
1
74-80

Greece

6,4
3
48-53

Guatemala4

7,0
2
27-31
Guinea4
5,0
1
115-117
Guyana4
6,4
1
48-53
Haiti4
4,5
1
132-133
Honduras4
6,5
2
43-47
Hong Kong
6,0
1
60-66
Hungary
5,5
4
86-92
Iceland
8,5
1
1
India4
5,9
2
67-73
Indonesia
6,6
1
40-42
Iran
6,0
1
60-66
Iraq
4,3
2
138-141

Ireland

7,5
3
13-15
Israel
6,7
2
38-39
Italy
6,8
3
34-37
Ivory Coast4
5,9
1
67-73
Jamaica4
6,6
1
40-42
Japan
6,4
2
48-53
Jordan
6,0
2
60-66
Kazakhstan4
6,0
1
60-66
Kenya4
5,2
1
102-109
Kosovo4
5,5
1
86-92
Kuwait4
6,7
2
38-39
Kyrgezigstan
6,1
1
56-59
Laos4
5,7
1
74-80
Latvia
5,1
1
110-114
Lebanon4
5,6
3
81-85
Liberia4
4,8
1
118-125
Lithuania
4,9
1
118-125

Luxembourg

7,7
3
8-11
Macedonia
4,6
1
128-131
Madagascar4
4,7
1
126-127
Malawi4
4,8
1
118-125
Malaysia
6,5
1
43-47
Mali
5,7
1
74-80
Malta
7,0
1
27-31
Mauretania4
5,7
1
74-80
Mexico
8,0
2
5
Moldova
4,9
1
118-125
Mongolia4
5,2
1
102-109
Montenegro
5,2
1
102-109
Morocco
5,2
2
102-109
Mozambique4
5,2
1
102-109
Myanmar (Burma)4
5,9
1
67-73
Namibia4
5,5
1
86-92
Nepal4
5,2
1
102-109

Netherlands

7,5
6
13-15
New Zealand
7,3
2
17-20
Nicaragua4
5,4
1
93-97
Niger4
4,5
1
132-133
Nigeria
6,5
1
43-47
Norway
7,7
3
8-11
Pakistan
4,3
1
138-141
Palestina4
5,4
1
93-97
Panama4
6,6
1
40-42
Paraguay4
5,5
1
86-92
Peru
6,4
2
48-53
Philippines
6,3
1
54-55

Poland

6,4
1
48-53

Portugal

5,7
4
74-80

Romania

5,5
4
86-92
Russia
5,4
2
93-97
Rwanda
4,4
1
134-1`37
Saudi Arabia
7,0
1
27-31
Senegal4
5,5
2
86-92
Serbia
5,6
1
81-85
Sierra Leone4
4,6
1
128-131
Singapore
6,8
1
34-37
Slovakia
5,6
3
81-85
Slovenia
6,8
2
34-37
South-Africa
6,0
3
60-66
South-Korea
5,9
3
67-73
Spain
7,2
6
21-24
Sri Lanka4
5,0
1
115-117
Sudan4
5,3
1
98-101
Sweden
7,7
6
8-11
Switzerland
8,1
6
3-4
Taiwan
6,2
1
60-66
Tajikistan4
5,4
1
93-97
Tanzania
3,2
1
145
Thailand
6,9
1
32-33
Togo4
4,1
1
143
Trinidad-Tabago
7,0
1
27-31
Tunesia4
5,9
1
67-73
Turkey
5,5
4
86-92
Uganda
5,1
1
110-114
Ukraine
4,8
2
118-125
United Arab Emirates4
7,1
1
25-26
United Kingdom (Britain)
7,1
6
25-26
United States of America (USA)
7,0
1
27-31
Uruguay4
6,1
1
56-59
Uzbekistan4
6,1
2
56-59
Venezuela
7,2
1
21-24
Vietnam
6,5
2
102-109
Yemen4
5,2
1
81-85
Zambia
5,6
1
144
Zimbabwe
3,3
1

Technical details

  1. Life-satisfaction is assessed by means of surveys in general population samples. Mean scores may be inflated in some countries, due to under sampling of rural and illiterate population. This distortion is partly corrected by weighting afterwards, but may still affect the scores. This means that the real differences in  life-satisfaction are probably somewhat greater than appears in these data.

  2. Data from 2000 up to and including 2006. If the below mentioned questions had been used more than once in this era, the average score is used.

  3. The scores are based on responses to a question about satisfaction with life, the answers to which were rated on a numerical scale ranging from 'dissatisfied' to 'satisfied'.  The questions differ slightly in wording and answer format. Most questions are type O-SLW/c/sq/n/10/a, next there are questions type O-Slu/c/sq/n/10/b and O-SLW/c/sq/n/11/c. This classification is explained in section 4/3 of the introductory text. Data were taken from the tables 122C and 122D from this database. Rating scales ranged from 1 to 10 or from 0 to 10. Scores on this 1-10 scale were transformed linearly to range 0-10. This transformation in explained in the introductory text, chapter 7.3.

  4. Scores of 56 nations are based on responses to a somewhat different question: "Suppose the top of the ladder represents the best possible life for you and the bottom of the ladder the worst possible life. Where on this ladder do you feel you personally stand at the present time?" The response was rated on a ladder scale ranging from 0 to 10 (item code C-BW/c/sq/l/11/c). We transformed the scores using the information of  nations in which both this item and the above question on life-satisfaction had been used in about the same years. There are 83 such cases. The scores on the two items appears to be highly correlated: r = +.82 and examination of the scatterplot shows a linear pattern without outliers. We computed the regression equation and used these to estimate the score on 0-10 life-satisfaction. The formula is: Estimated 0-10 life satisfaction = 1,25 + 0,864 x observed score on the Best-Worst item. These estimates are reported in this table. The 95% confidence interval around these estimated values is about 1,5 points, which means that these estimates are not very precise.

    This estimation technique is described in more detail in the Introductory Text, chapter 7 'Comparability of the data' in section 7/3.1 'Converting scores on measures of different happiness variants'.

  5. On this list the following cases are left out: Puerto Rico (8,3), East Germany (6,5) West Germany (7,0) and Northern Ireland (7.7). These cases are included in the collection of Happiness in Nations but are no real 'nations'

  6.  The use for these data for estimating livability of nations is discussed in the Introductory Text to this section on 'Distributional Findings in Nations', chapter 5: Validity of happiness as an indicator of livability'

  7.  This list is included in the datafile 'States of nations' as variable HappinessLSBW_2000.2008.

Cite as:
Veenhoven, R., Average happiness in 145 nations 2000-2008 , World Database of Happiness, RankReport 2009-1a, Internet: worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl